Practical Training in Law in the Netherlands: Big Law Model or Clinical Model, and the Call of Public Interest Law
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18352/ulr.187Keywords:
practical training, public interest law, clinical legal education, legal education, big law, comparative lawAbstract
This article identifies two models now at work in the Netherlands, models that present potentially competing visions of practical training for law graduates seeking entry into the legal profession. The first is the Law Firm School, a new innovation in 2009, designed and funded by 14 major Amsterdam law firms, firms that make up part of what is often called Big Law. The Law Firm School model is embedded within the traditional apprenticeship training for all lawyers, but is available only to associates of the participating firms. The second model is clinical legal education, which ideally is offered as part of the course of study within the curriculum of formal legal education. The article presents four separate examples of clinical legal education now in operation in the Netherlands. These two models are examined within the broader context of public interest lawyering, a style of law practice common to the United States and almost non-existent in the domestic legal culture of the Netherlands outside of a broad program of legal aid. The further development of clinical legal education responds more fully, it is argued, to the call of public interest practice: the need for training of new lawyers for a legal profession that focuses on the values of justice, fairness and morality in everyday law practice.Downloads
Published
2012-01-27
Issue
Section
Articles
License
Copyright (c) 2012 The Author(s)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant Utrecht Law Review right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in the Utrecht Law Review.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in Utrecht Law Review.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Once accepted for publication, the final version of the paper must be provided. A completed and signed copyright form, which will be sent by the Managing Editor, must accompany each paper. By signing the form the author states to accept the copyright notice of Utrecht Law Review. The copyright notice for authors is also included in the copyright acceptance form.